Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +1 This documents gets out out of the house, and now that it's empty,
>> the house can be
>> "sold"/rented/demolished-to-make-space-for-a-hyperspace-bypass.
> I don't really understand what George and Michael mean, but in any
> case, the future of .int is not the IETF's business, once we get this
> draft approved and thereby completely separate the IETF from .int. Some
> other people somewhere else can then discuss it.
I think that we are using different words, and probably George and I are not
using the correct historical statements, but that we are all in violent agreement.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
