Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-davies-int-historic-04.txt> (Deprecating infrastructure "int" domains) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



George Michaelson <ggm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > 2) why does IANA continue to "operate" the domain, if there is no
    > dependency and no forseen use? The proper way to get shot of a burden,
    > is to give it to somebody else. Re-delegate to ICANN and make them
    > responsible for the registrar decisions about what treaty bodies are
    > allowed to have state in .INT

+1
This documents gets out out of the house, and now that it's empty, the house
can be "sold"/rented/demolished-to-make-space-for-a-hyperspace-bypass.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux