Toerless Eckert wrote:
Since the last last time you mention, AFAIK, there has been a lot more focus on language in the IETF including inclusive language which made every RFC author more involved in considerations about language by being called out on it by RFC editor.
As for difficulties with inclusive language, see, for example: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/szfzLAbV9EmQ7kmz3HGfaLkLhT0/ As such, insisting on inclusive language with your own idea on "inclusive" is rather a problem to be corrected, not a good practice to be followed, I think.
Likewise we have BCP 83 PR action going on.
The following statement in rfc9245 (part of BCP 83) Uncivil commentary, regardless of the general subject, per the IETF Note Well [NOTE-WELL] and the following statement in [NOTE-WELL] As a participant or attendee, you agree to work respectfully with other participants; certainly prohibit personal attacks but not beyond, which means nothing has changed for decades. Masataka Ohta
