Hi John,
At 07:04 AM 03-10-2022, John Scudder wrote:
I'm curious as to what you think the right
approach would have been, then. Let's review. BCP 83 says:
A PR-action identifies one or more individuals, citing messages
posted by those individuals to an IETF mailing list, that appear to
be abusive of the consensus-driven process.
So, the initiation of the PR-Action requires
that the IESG form some opinion as to the
whether the cited messages "appear to be abusive
of the consensus-driven process"?.
The requirement is for a a PR-action to initiated
by an IESG Area Director. The intent was for it
to be similar to a "protocol action". The text
quoted above does not require other Area
Directors to form an opinion about whether the
messages posted by the individuals appear to be
abusive of the consensus-driven process.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
