Re: [Last-Call] OT: change BCP 83 [Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Adam,

On 02.10.22 11:12, Adam Roach wrote:
For what it's worth, the SAA team has a formal policy of handling matters of "uncivil commentary and disruptive behavior" off-list unless and until the poster persists in their behavior. See <https://github.com/ietf/Moderators/tree/main/email-templates>. Subsequent actions are publicly announced, because they carry at least nominal consequences for the people being disruptive, and because the community has historically demanded a radical amount of transparency when anything like that happens.

Two point heres:

As your anecdote demonstrates, these kinds tools are already entirely within the purview of WG chairs (and their analogs for other mailing lists). The introduction to BCP 83 explicitly calls out that actions of this sort have historically been undertaken, and does nothing to remove permission for them to continue to be applied to this day.

As long as the chair has them in the toolkit, that's fine- I'll confess I'm not an expert on this aspect of IETF process.  My issue with BCP 83 has to do with steps 2, 3, and 5 of the process.  2 and 3 are not necessary, and the community needn't make a decision about an individual.  It's a poor use of our time, and subjects the individual to humiliation.  We should stop that.

Eliot


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux