Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As it is so obviously demonstrated that requiring to be "civil"
can and do mean unacceptable censorship, why do some of you bother
to keep discussing about "which behavior is appropriate or not"?

It is obvious that behavior of management people to require
rest of us to be "professional" or "civil", whatever it means,
is not only inappropriate but also unacceptable.

Instead, rest of us can and should enjoy freedom of speech without
being disturbed by censorship attempts of unprofessional/uncivil
/immoral/unlawful management functions, which shouldn't be
functions originally expected for SAAs.

Remember that SAAs were provided against highly commercially
motivated people seeking for alternative DNS root but
*definitely* not beyond.

					Masataka Ohta




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux