Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 3, 2021, at 19:24, tom petch wrote:
On 31/10/2021 03:38, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> s/Unprofessional commentary/Uncivil commentary/
>
> Merriam-Webster Online says:
>
> Definition of uncivil
>
> 1 : not civilized : barbarous
> 2 : lacking in courtesy : ill-mannered, impolite uncivil remarks
> 3 : not conducive to civic harmony and welfare

I slept on this and decided that I prefer professional.  Civil is to me 
more social and less, well, professional.  This is about getting the 
work done, focussing on technical matters, with reason, logic, avoiding 
'ad hominem' and emotional outbursts (as the follow-up e-mails in the 
thread may show).

I would consider courteous, respectful, considerate but come back to 
professional as the best IMO.

I kind of agree, but I also realise that there's probably some cultural baggage here and civil might translate better in the parts of the world which aren't primarily English-speaking and to people who aren't corporate professionals.

Cheers,

Bron.

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux