Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



s/Unprofessional commentary/Uncivil commentary/

Merriam-Webster Online says:

Definition of uncivil

1 : not civilized : barbarous
2 : lacking in courtesy : ill-mannered, impolite uncivil remarks
3 : not conducive to civic harmony and welfare

Regards
   Brian Carpenter
   Thinking of the IETF standards process: https://xkcd.com/2530/

On 31-Oct-21 13:34, Keith Moore wrote:

Absolutely. That's why I threw together

http://lloydwood.users.sourceforge.net/Personal/L.Wood/publications/internet-drafts/README.html
<http://lloydwood.users.sourceforge.net/Personal/L.Wood/publications/internet-drafts/README.html>

in my defence, because every so often I get asked to justify my worth
and existence to some random corporate apparatchik of some random
company who has decided that he (and it's always a he. women just
don't do that whole  'you must justify your right to exist to me'
thing) dislikes my participation in an IETF mailing list.

And that's why it's important to reinforce the idea that IETF
participants are NOT representatives of their employers, but at most
"sponsored" by them (or in many cases they pay their own way), and IETF
participants are expected to use their own best technical judgment about
what's good for the Internet as a whole.

Keith







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux