On 10/21/21 5:07 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Why do we publish about 300 RFCs per year, rather than (say) 100 or 500?
Is the relevance of a typical IETF RFC going up or down? (I suspect the latter, but I'd love to have a reason to believe we're getting more relevant over time)
My impression is that the amount of work and time to produce an RFC stays about the same over time, or maybe increases. If the relevance of a typical RFC is decreasing, we may be wasting a lot of effort.
Keith