Re: Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]

To: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba=40computer.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:37:05 +0000
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <02ccb205-d628-b490-946b-a518e963e210@network-heretics.com>
References: <20211021005426.639E92B1D176@ary.qy> <e6d59712-ca73-0723-5cb2-b1f749e37577@network-heretics.com> <CAC4RtVDCxp7RveAXxTUU47fYXw5ebV+yJTMkDAJWGvcq-4DyTw@mail.gmail.com> <25a9f62e-1957-0e77-1e7a-733d9dae4a86@gmail.com> <02ccb205-d628-b490-946b-a518e963e210@network-heretics.com>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.54.21101001

>   Is the relevance of a typical IETF RFC going up or down?

How do you tell?  Can you measure it, other than have opinions?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
  - From: John Levine
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
  - From: Barry Leiba
- Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
  - From: Keith Moore