On 2/25/2021 4:03 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
the I-D
should at least warn people about what they are getting into
rather than saying "The ABNF rule Emoji-Seq is inherited from
[Emoji-Seq]" and stopping.
At Barry's suggestion earlier today the next version of the draft
already contains:
<t>The ABNF rule emoji_sequence is inherited from <xref
target="Emoji-Seq"/>. It defines a set of octet
sequences, each of which forms a single pictograph. The
BNF syntax used in [Emoji-Seq] differs
from <xref target="ABNF"/>, and MUST be interpreted as
used in Unicode documentation.</t>
it seems to me that, if we do so and
know those are problem areas, we are under some obligation to
identify those areas and ask for feedback on whether they were
problems in practice as part of the experiment.
Send text.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@xxxxxxxxx
408.329.0791
Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
