Re: IETF 110 schedule update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



top posting: agree with Christian that "night shift" is not an impossibility.
My earlier comment only meant to support Stewart's observation of "a consistent message about 109 schedule from US participants"

Lixia

On Dec 30, 2020, at 11:57 AM, Christian Huitema <huitema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 12/30/2020 9:43 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:

Lixia,

This is on top of the issues people have mentioned: your surroundings and surrounding people go by local time, making sleep hour adjustment (to remote meeting time) difficult, a big factor on its own.
(about a consistent message about 109 schedule from US participants: my guess is that 109's 9pm-3am pacific schedule affected US, especially pacific people most? I recall 108 was 4-9AM pacific, which was manageable)

For those of us on the US east coast, it was midnight-6AM.

There are plenty of professions in which people have to work the night shift. They encounter exactly all the problems that we see described here, having to sleep during the day time, eating at odd hours, not socializing with their family, etc. It is hard, but the people doing that manage, including those who have my age. I suppose it is a matter of setting expectations with your family and your job.

-- Christian Huitema



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux