Re: IETF 110 schedule update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben,

> It's your prerogative to place those hard limits, sure.  (109 was 9pm-3am
> for me and I managed, but I am very fortunate in my home environment.)  But
> my understanding is that for any 6-hour block you pick, "the participants
> that get the hardest slot" will have that slow overlap with their
> midnight-6am window, and it's far from obvious that we want to always give
> the hardest slot to the same limited set of people.  Hence, having a WG to
> consider it…

Agreed.

I had the same local times for IETF109 and dealt with it.   The other challenge for many folks, is that unlike when you travel, when doing the meetings at home, it’s hard to turn off everything else in your life (work and personal) in your local day time.   Make it even harder.

I agree it is good to have a w.g. consider better solutions, but to me not all problems have better solutions.   I think we are going to have to just live with the pain until we can meet face to face again.

Bob



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux