Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Dec 17, 2020, at 5:58 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

What we mean is:

#1: Spell out the interop req. i.e., tell us the properties that the IDs must have. -- we want to know the minium requirements the IDs need to comply to.

#2: Analyze the possible implications of such IDs.

#3: If you found any possible issues in #2, just suggest something to the implementer that complies with #1 and deals gracefully with #2.

That would be the topic of a document on “Specifying the interoperability requirements of generated IDs in protocols”.

That is not the title of this document; the difference between the two is where we disagree.

Joe
-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux