>> I have read the most recent version of this document, and I support this experiment. >> >> I find this part of Section 2 confusing: >> >> The experiment will initially cover the IETF Nominating Committee >> cycle that begins in 2021. As soon as the 2021-2022 Nominating >> Committee is seated, the IESG must consult the 2021-2022 Nominating >> Committee chair and the 2020-2021 Nominating Committee chair and >> publish a report on the results of the experiment. Points to be >> considered are whether the experiment has produced a sufficiently >> large and diverse pool of individuals, and whether enough of those >> individuals have volunteered to produce a representative Nominating >> Committee with good knowledge of the IETF. If possible, a comparison >> with results from the previous procedure (i.e., RFC 8713) should be >> made. >> >> As soon as the next NomCom Chair is seated, > > No, you've misread it slightly. It says "As soon as the 2021-2022 Nominating *Committee* is seated" (emphasis added). Admittedly, that's before the 2021-22 NomCom Chair has actually chaired any meetings, so I wouldn't expect the consultation to be done instantly. Does that help? I see. I did misread that one word. To avoid others doing the same, would it be better to say: "Between Date X and Date Y, the IESG must consult with the current NomCom Chair and the Past NomCom Chais ..." Russ -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
