On 10-Dec-20 16:06, Russ Housley wrote: > >>> I have read the most recent version of this document, and I support this experiment. >>> >>> I find this part of Section 2 confusing: >>> >>> The experiment will initially cover the IETF Nominating Committee >>> cycle that begins in 2021. As soon as the 2021-2022 Nominating >>> Committee is seated, the IESG must consult the 2021-2022 Nominating >>> Committee chair and the 2020-2021 Nominating Committee chair and >>> publish a report on the results of the experiment. Points to be >>> considered are whether the experiment has produced a sufficiently >>> large and diverse pool of individuals, and whether enough of those >>> individuals have volunteered to produce a representative Nominating >>> Committee with good knowledge of the IETF. If possible, a comparison >>> with results from the previous procedure (i.e., RFC 8713) should be >>> made. >>> >>> As soon as the next NomCom Chair is seated, >> >> No, you've misread it slightly. It says "As soon as the 2021-2022 Nominating *Committee* is seated" (emphasis added). Admittedly, that's before the 2021-22 NomCom Chair has actually chaired any meetings, so I wouldn't expect the consultation to be done instantly. Does that help? > > I see. I did misread that one word. To avoid others doing the same, would it be better to say: "Between Date X and Date Y, the IESG must consult with the current NomCom Chair and the Past NomCom Chais ..." Yes, we can certainly adjust the wording to avoid that misunderstanding. Thanks again Brian -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
