Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>    So far, there are evidences English language accepted by most
    US people has not changed in a way insisted by some.

This is not correct.  Looking at just the tech industry here is a partial list of companies that are doing something:
	W3C
	Twitter (https://www.newsweek.com/twitter-engineers-new-list-coding-terms-more-inclusive-1515131)
	Android, GitHub, Splunk, UK National Security Cyber Center (https://thenewstack.io/words-matter-finally-tech-looks-at-removing-exclusionary-language/)
	RedHat (https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/qj4jqb/red-hat-audit-to-eradicate-problematic-language-in-its-code)
	IBM (https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/2DZELQ4O etc)
	Google (https://developers.google.com/style/inclusive-documentation)







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux