Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:34:18PM +1200,
 Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 10 lines which said:

> Since you ask, the answer seems obvious: its name is "Master Clock"
> so there's nothing else you can call it. "Master" on its own is here
> to stay, anyway; in some contexts the proposed alternatives (like
> "main") simply don't work. That's why most of the advice to authors
> cannot be binary; we can't resolve this just with a blocklist
> approach.

And this is also why it cannot be implemented in tools. Even the best
AI cannot know if the use of a word like master is oppressive or not.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux