.. and of course why it cannot be properly litigated against in an RFC. The OED defines it as †a. gen. A person (predominantly, a man) having authority, direction or control over the action of another or others; a director, leader, chief, commander; a ruler, governor. Obsolete(archaic in later use).And when we use it technically we are using it in the same sense but applied between automatons that feel no slight. The word goes back to old English but the first quotes use in the OED in the modern spellings is in the King James Bible (1611), so I imagine that it unlikely to be expunged from common English any time soon. The first use in conjunction with slavery seems to be 1833 so it is a much more recent definition. If you look overall with the OED entry the context in which the authors of the draft raise the term is relatively infrequent, with most associations seemingly relatively benign. FWIW the first technical reference to master-slave seems to be in 1952 and in reference to the a system for the manipulation of irradiated items rather than computers. The first technical introduction of master-slave I had was the context of a J-K flip-flop where it describes the relationship extremely well. The master takes arbitrary action and the slave has no choice but to follow or very occasionally rebel (metastability is is a big problem in flip-flops) so in many ways the term is a perfect fit. What is the new standard term in that context? - Stewart |
