On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:28:01PM -0700, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > On which planet did this happen ? > > How do you come to interpret what happened in that way ? > > Luigi declined to serve. Thats all. > > I'm not sure that we actually have enough information to say that. > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/o8p6rh9boOs65QTTIpBb73t-fV4/ > says "has informed [the Nomcom chair] his affiliation has recently > changed". That's not exactly "has said he cannot serve", and doesn't say > anything about when the affiliation changed with respect to the timeline of > the Nomcom selection process. Is there other information available that > I'm missing (n.b. I'm quite behind on IETF mail at the moment)? Sure, but yada yada yada -> he decided that he did not want to serve. Aka: How is all the justification how he arrived at that decision relevant ? And even if the reasons where relevant, for which i can not find any evidence in the relevant RFCs, then i can't see how this woud have changed the outcome. And even if he would have decided that he did want to serve, it would have been up to NomCom chair to decide (my reading of the RFC), and but i can't seriously not think of how a NomCom chair would have kicked out anyone else (from that company) than the person newly announcing the affiliation. The argument made on the list is to violate section 5.1 of rfc3793 AFAIK. Cheers Toerless
