On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 05:44:34PM -0700, Joseph Touch wrote: > > > > On Jul 10, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I think Mike did a good job in confusing the facts, and maybe the > > explanations from NomCom > > IMO, Mike is correct. > > I think the intent here is simple: there aren???t Huawei slots; when someone from a given company steps out, that doesn???t mean someone from that company steps in. Of course not, but: On which planet did this happen ? How do you come to interpret what happened in that way ? Luigi declined to serve. Thats all. What am i overlooking here ? > The right thing is to re-run the process and see what the result is. rfc3797 section 5.1, paragraph 3. > Otherwise, as is being seen, one person can ???game??? who is on the committee. That???s exactly what the detailed automated process is intended to prevent. And if 99% of NomCom qualified people are from one company, we can't build a NomCom. Please do not use ridiculous theories to justify changes in process or mishandling of the existing rules. Toerless > Joe > -- --- tte@xxxxxxxxx
