On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Chris Moller <moller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My point in my original post was that a toolkit should, above all, be > useful, preferably in as wide a range of uses as possible. And, by that > measure, GTK2 was a great deal more useful, at least in certain > environments, than GTK3. Not every app needs the stylistic consistency > offered by a fairly complex CSS paradigm. The code I write is primarily in > aid of technical visualisation involving cairographics in a drawing area, > OpenGL, and so on, and usually involves a complex UI containing lots and > lots of spinbutton widgets and similar controls. Screen space is a premium, > a pretty UI is not, and there some things that, so far as I've been able to > discover, you just can't do with the GTK3 CSS mechanism that are trivial to > do under GTK2. If you fail to bend GTK to your will and Qt also doesn't fit, I think FLTK is used in the domain you describe. Not sure about Fox but FLTK is used for applications like that. In case you start looking for alternatives. _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
