How do i establish connection between two endpoints which are in WAN Using Gatekeeper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ulises,
> >
> >   Haven't get any reply to my previous messages which i send u already
> >
> >   I have a problems to configure the gnugk in WAN hope will get solution
> >   to my problem.
> >
> >   I want to make a call from Endpoint A which is at one state (say in
> > India) and also registered
> >   itself with registered with Gatekeeper running at the same place in
> > routed mode.
> >
> >   and other endpoint B which is running at other states(say Other
> > than India), has to registered with gatekeeper
> >   running at Endpoint A. this is what i want to do
> >
> >   Ue(A)<-----> GnuGk<------>Ue(B)
> >
> >   But finding probelm when Endpoint B is trying to register itself
> > with gatekeeper....
> >   endpoint A is registered properly
> >
> >   But the same thing is working fine at LAN and also through Net in local
> > place
> >
> >   Can any one tell me do i need to do any settings or need to change
> > configuration
> >
> >   file to establish a connection between the above endpoints with
> > gatekeeper
> >
> >   configuration file of gatekeeper is as below. (routed Mode)
> >
> > regards
> > jyothi
> >
> > ##[Gatekeeper::Main]
> >
> > Fourtytwo=42
> >
> > Name = WIFI GateKeeper
> > TimeToLive=600
> >
> > TotalBandwidth = 100000
> >
> > [RoutedMode];
> > call signalling (Q.931) routed
> >
> > GKRouted=1;
> > control channel (H.245) routed
> >
> > H245Routed=1;
> > use 1721 as the port of call signalling
> >
> > CallSignalPort=1721;
> > for dual CPUs
> >
> > CallSignalHandlerNumber=2;
> > accept calls from neighbor gatekeepers
> >
> > AcceptNeighborsCalls=1;
> > don't accept calls from unregistered endpoints
> >
> > AcceptUnregisteredCalls=0;
> >
> > force to stay in tunneling mode if Tunneling flag is TRUE
> >
> > RemoveH245AddressOnTunneling=1;
> >
> > send Release Complete to drop calls
> > DropCallsByReleaseComplete=1;
> >
> > send Release Complete on receiving DRQ
> >
> > SendReleaseCompleteOnDRQ=1;
> >
> > accept registration of an endpoint behind an NAT box
> >
> > SupportNATedEndpoints=1;
> >
> > port range for Q.931 channel
> >
> > Q931PortRange=30000-39999;
> >
> > port range for H.245 channel
> >
> > H245PortRange=40000-49999
> >
> > [Proxy]
> > Enable=0
> >
> > [GkStatus::Auth]
> > rule=allow
> > # EOF
> >
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:28:28 +0100, Zygmuntowicz Michal
<m.zygmuntowicz@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The first step should be posting to the right list
> openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (I'm forwarding the message). The second - examining GnuGk log (at trace
> level 5).
> The third - if there arer firewalls/NAT on the way - you will likely run
> into problems.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "pilli Jyothi" <pilli.jyothi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 11:23 AM
> 
> > Hi Ulises,
> >
> >   Haven't get any reply to my previous messages which i send u already
> >
> >   I have a problems to configure the gnugk in WAN hope will get solution
> >   to my problem.
> >
> >   I want to make a call from Endpoint A which is at one state (say in
> > India) and also registered
> >   itself with registered with Gatekeeper running at the same place in
> > routed mode.
> >
> >   and other endpoint B which is running at other states(say Other
> > than India), has to registered with gatekeeper
> >   running at Endpoint A. this is what i want to do
> >
> >   Ue(A)<-----> GnuGk<------>Ue(B)
> >
> >   But finding probelm when Endpoint B is trying to register itself
> > with gatekeeper....
> >   endpoint A is registered properly
> >
> >   But the same thing is working fine at LAN and also through Net in local
> > place
> >
> >   Can any one tell me do i need to do any settings or need to change
> > configuration
> >
> >   file to establish a connection between the above endpoints with
> > gatekeeper
> >
> >   configuration file of gatekeeper is as below. (routed Mode)
> >
> > regards
> > jyothi
> >
> > ##[Gatekeeper::Main]
> >
> > Fourtytwo=42
> >
> > Name = WIFI GateKeeper
> > TimeToLive=600
> >
> > TotalBandwidth = 100000
> >
> > [RoutedMode];
> > call signalling (Q.931) routed
> >
> > GKRouted=1;
> > control channel (H.245) routed
> >
> > H245Routed=1;
> > use 1721 as the port of call signalling
> >
> > CallSignalPort=1721;
> > for dual CPUs
> >
> > CallSignalHandlerNumber=2;
> > accept calls from neighbor gatekeepers
> >
> > AcceptNeighborsCalls=1;
> > don't accept calls from unregistered endpoints
> >
> > AcceptUnregisteredCalls=0;
> >
> > force to stay in tunneling mode if Tunneling flag is TRUE
> >
> > RemoveH245AddressOnTunneling=1;
> >
> > send Release Complete to drop calls
> > DropCallsByReleaseComplete=1;
> >
> > send Release Complete on receiving DRQ
> >
> > SendReleaseCompleteOnDRQ=1;
> >
> > accept registration of an endpoint behind an NAT box
> >
> > SupportNATedEndpoints=1;
> >
> > port range for Q.931 channel
> >
> > Q931PortRange=30000-39999;
> >
> > port range for H.245 channel
> >
> > H245PortRange=40000-49999
> >
> > [Proxy]
> > Enable=0
> >
> > [GkStatus::Auth]
> > rule=allow
> > # EOF
> >
> > On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 10:58:44 -0600, Ulises Salvador Vega Arteaga
> > <ulises.vega@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hi, i've been trying without succes.
> >> As you said it works fine with netmeeting in both directions.
> >> If you can help me to find what exactlty netmeeting does in order to
> >> establish connections, that would be a lot of  help?
> >> In the same way, if you are able to findout  if a cisco ubr7246 if able
> >> to block incoming calls for h.323 by product id, manufacturer or
> >> something like that? It'll be great.
> >> I think that may be my mycable company has product form Quintum
> >> (www.quintum.com ) to manage h.323 calls, what about you?
> >> I tried to fake netmeeting identity in my  h.323 application i made it,
> >> but the call  establishment is still  without succes, have you tried
> >> that.?
> >>
> >> does anybody on the list know what exactly netmeeting does to establish
> >> a call?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> pilli Jyothi wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >     I've been running some test of H.323 over cable networks with the
> >> >following configuration
> >> >
> >> >     epA(1)-----------------(2) || GK ||(3) ----------(4)|| ISP over
> >> > Cable
> >> >
> >> >This the scenario where i try to test for audio
> >> >
> >> >   epA(1) is an endpoint and having Static IP.
> >> >
> >> >   || X|| , doble parallel bars means firewall, X represents what is in
> >> > the
> >> >middle
> >> >
> >> >   *ISP over Cable network , at (4) will get Dynamic IP when connected
> >> > to Net
> >> >
> >> >* When i try to make a call from my PC ( has Static IP) to the remote
> >> >system which is having Dynamic IPconnected through cable connection is
> >> >getting cleared
> >> >
> >> >Can u tell me how to establish connection between these two endpoints
> >> >if i want to have voice chat...
> >> >
> >> >Thanks & regards
> >> >jyothi
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:43:00 -0600, Ulises Salvador Vega Arteaga
> >> ><ulises.vega@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>I  ran the test with Netmeeting 3.01 at noon,  and it ran well.
> >> >>Any idea how could i check why there is no audio transmission over a
> >> >>cable network  while using openh323.?
> >> >>
> >> >>Thanks in advanced.
> >> >>
> >> >>Ulises Vega
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>Ulises Salvador Vega Arteaga wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>Hi,
> >> >>>
> >> >>>I've been running some test of H.323 over cable networks with the
> >> >>>following configuration
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>epA(1)-----------------(2) || GK ||(3) ----------(4)|| ISP over Cable
> >> >>>network ||(5)--------(6)epB, epC (epB, and epC use same ip address but
> >> >>>different siganling, ras, and rtp ports)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>|_____(7)epD,epE (dial-up connection 56kbps)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>                    (epD, and epE use same ip address but different
> >> >>>siganling, ras, and rtp ports)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>(ep, means endpoint)
> >> >>>|| X|| , doble parallel bars means firewall, X represents what is in
> >> >>>the middle
> >> >>>*epA is on  private ip at (1),
> >> >>>
> >> >>>*GK is on a firewall on a server running linux redhat, working fine as
> >> >>>a proxy (I know this becuase i've tested voice transmission from
> >> >>>dial-up connection outside of the firewall as shown in epD at (7) and
> >> >>>I can communicate very clearly with epA, bidirectionally with no
> >> >>>problem).
> >> >>>
> >> >>>*ISP over Cable network , at (4) has a fixed public IP address
> >> >>>attached to epB by MAC matching,
> >> >>>                                          at (5) has private IP
> >> >>> adress.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>*epB at 6 has private IP address
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>The situation is a s follows: from epB,  i can registert to the GK,
> >> >>>establish a call up (setup, connect, opening of audio channels), but
> >> >>>udp packets that carry voice cannot pass to epA,or epC, even more
> >> >>>I cannot hear myself  when i call epC from epB, eventhough as i said
> >> >>>before, connectino is established (arq, acf, setup,..., until opening
> >> >>>of audio channels work fine).
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Some interesting points might be:
> >> >>>*I have disabled bandwidht management at GK, the requested bandwidht
> >> >>>by any ep is 100000 (as default value for initialbandwidth in
> >> >>>H323Endpoint). I don't think it is a bandwith problem
> >> >>>because I'm receving ACF from GK. And more, I dont get a connection
> >> >>>cleared message with rease NoBandwidthAvailable, even more, audio
> >> >>>channels don't get broken because i can stay on the call hearing
> >> >>>nothing for as long as i want.
> >> >>>*The same operation was done on dialup connection  (epD,epE) and works
> >> >>>fine.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Question:
> >> >>>*what should  i do to hear myself at least  locally (my PC, between
> >> >>>epB, and epC) behind cable network LAN?
> >> >>>*what effect might cause a cablemodem on the PC strong enough to not
> >> >>>allow  hearing myself  on the same PC?
> >> >>>*in general, any idea? links that i could rview
> >> >>>*I'm about to run Netmeeting over the cable network to the ouside
> >> >>>world to see if ti works, has somebody tried this at home?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Best regards.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Ulises Vega
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check the FAQ before asking! - http://www.openh323.org/~openh323/fom.cgi
> The OpenH323 Project mailing list, using Mailman. To unsubscribe or
> change your subscription options, goto
> http://www.openh323.org/mailman/listinfo/openh323
> Maintained by Quicknet Technologies, Inc - http://www.quicknet.net
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click

_______________________________________________________

List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux