--- Zygmuntowicz Michal <m@xxxxx> wrote: > You should look rather at the neighbor section and > try > to configure > it to not simply forward LRQs. Instead, LRQs should > be generated from > scratch > and sent to the Cisco GK with the reply address set > to gatekeeper address. > Search the manual for details. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Javier Escobar" <colombian989@xxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:12 PM > > > > We are having a problem with gnugk where one side > is a > > Nextel GK and the terminating end is a Cisco GK. > > > > Here is what happens: > > > > Nextel --> gnugk ---> Cisco GK > > > > The Nextel sends an LRQ to our GK. Almost > immediately > > after the first LRQ it sends a second LRQ and > gnugk > > replies with RIP (requestInProgress). > > > > After sending the RIP, the origination point and > the > > endpoint (Nextl and Cisco) continue the dialogue > > directly and completely bypass our GK. The net > effect > > is that we no longer get CDRs. > > > > We"ve tried routed mode, H.245 routed mode and > full > > proxy but the Nextel always bypasses after the > RIP > > message and engages the endpoint directly. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
