it to not simply forward LRQs. Instead, LRQs should be generated from scratch
and sent to the Cisco GK with the reply address set to gatekeeper address.
Search the manual for details.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Javier Escobar" <colombian989@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:12 PM
We are having a problem with gnugk where one side is a Nextel GK and the terminating end is a Cisco GK.
Here is what happens:
Nextel --> gnugk ---> Cisco GK
The Nextel sends an LRQ to our GK. Almost immediately after the first LRQ it sends a second LRQ and gnugk replies with RIP (requestInProgress).
After sending the RIP, the origination point and the endpoint (Nextl and Cisco) continue the dialogue directly and completely bypass our GK. The net effect is that we no longer get CDRs.
We've tried routed mode, H.245 routed mode and full proxy but the Nextel always bypasses after the RIP message and engages the endpoint directly.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
