I disagree. I don't think there is any "right" time or place to correct GPL misinterpretations. And furthermore, the GPL allows the sale of "product", not just know-how. You simply have to include source code and a copy of the GPL with your product. On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 17:50, Zygmuntowicz Michal wrote: > > At the risk of being proved wrong, I don't think that's correct. I have > > read the GPL and have followed myriads of GPL threads on usenet and /. > > amd I'm pretty sure that anyone can sell any GPL code as long as the > > source code is freely provided and the GPL is included. > > Sure - then you are selling you know-how and this is right thing. > But some sell the product and deny to publish the code, optionally > removing copyrights, so the customers are often not aware that this > could be an opensource software. Anyway, I think this is not right > list fo such discussion - we are people who like to work on gnugk > being better and better, not to hunt for opensource enemies:-) > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
