Re: Suggest a feature redirect

[Aravinda <avishwan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

regards
Aravinda

On 05/19/2016 12:37 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote:

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 05/19/2016 02:38 AM, Amye Scavarda wrote:

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Raghavendra Talur
    <rtalur@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rtalur@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
    >
    >
    > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye@xxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:amye@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal
    >> <humble.devassy@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:humble.devassy@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>> Hi Amye,
    >>>
    >>> afaict, the feature proposal has start from glusterfs-specs
    >>> (http://review.gluster.org/#/q/project:glusterfs-specs) project
    under
    >>> review.gluster.org <http://review.gluster.org>
    >>>
    >>> --Humble
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye@xxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:amye@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>> Currently on the gluster.org <http://gluster.org> website,
    we're directing the 'Suggest a
    >>>> feature' to the old mediawiki site for 'Features'.
    >>>> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features
    >>>>
    >>>> In an ideal world, this would go somewhere else. Where should
    this go?
    >>>> Let me know and I'll fix it.
    >>>> - amye
    >>>>
    >>>> --
    >>>> Amye Scavarda | amye@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:amye@xxxxxxxxxx> |
    Gluster Community Lead
    >>>>
    >>>> _______________________________________________
    >>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
    >>>> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
    >>>
    >>>
    >> Said another way, if you wanted to be able to have someone
    contribute a
    >> feature idea, what would be the best way?
    >> Bugzilla? A google form? An email into the -devel list?
    >>
    >
    > If it is more of a request from a user it should a bugzilla RFE.
    If the user
    > requested on -devel list without a bug, then one of the community devs
    > should file a bug for it.
    > If it is a proposal for a feature with design
    details/implementation ideas
    > then a patch to glusterfs-specs is encouraged.


    In any case opening a discussion on gluster-devel would be ideal to
    get the attention of all concerned.

    -Vijay


So should this stay on the website in the first place?
- amye

Yes, the relevant workflow needs to be in the website. In the absence of that, newcomers to the community might find it difficult to understand our workflow.

Currently it is 

<h5>

<a href=''>

<i class='fa fa-fw fa-comment'></i>

Suggest a feature!

</a>

</h5>

which points to old wiki.

Would it be better to have

<a href=""true" href="http://gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Feature">gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Feature Proposal">Suggest a feature</a> 

there?

Makes sense. Is it possible to send mail to this list without registration? or moderator can verify the feature mail from unsubscribed user and allow?

Thanks,

Raghavendra Talur

-Vijay

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel