On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05/19/2016 02:38 AM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Raghavendra Talur
<rtalur@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rtalur@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:amye@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal
>> <humble.devassy@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:humble.devassy@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Amye,
>>>
>>> afaict, the feature proposal has start from glusterfs-specs
>>> (http://review.gluster.org/#/q/project:glusterfs-specs) project
under
>>> review.gluster.org <http://review.gluster.org>
>>>
>>> --Humble
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:amye@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Currently on the gluster.org <http://gluster.org> website,
we're directing the 'Suggest a
>>>> feature' to the old mediawiki site for 'Features'.
>>>> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features
>>>>
>>>> In an ideal world, this would go somewhere else. Where should
this go?
>>>> Let me know and I'll fix it.
>>>> - amye
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Amye Scavarda | amye@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:amye@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Gluster Community Lead
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>
>>>
>> Said another way, if you wanted to be able to have someone
contribute a
>> feature idea, what would be the best way?
>> Bugzilla? A google form? An email into the -devel list?
>>
>
> If it is more of a request from a user it should a bugzilla RFE.
If the user
> requested on -devel list without a bug, then one of the community devs
> should file a bug for it.
> If it is a proposal for a feature with design
details/implementation ideas
> then a patch to glusterfs-specs is encouraged.
In any case opening a discussion on gluster-devel would be ideal to
get the attention of all concerned.
-Vijay
So should this stay on the website in the first place?
- amye
Yes, the relevant workflow needs to be in the website. In the absence of that, newcomers to the community might find it difficult to understand our workflow.
Currently it is
<h5>
<a href="" href="http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features">http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features'>
<i class='fa fa-fw fa-comment'></i>
Suggest a feature!
</a>
</h5>
| which points to old wiki. |
Would it be better to have
<a href="" gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Feature Proposal">Suggest a feature</a>
there?
Thanks,
Raghavendra Talur
-Vijay
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
