On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In any case opening a discussion on gluster-devel would be ideal toOn Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal
>> <humble.devassy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Amye,
>>>
>>> afaict, the feature proposal has start from glusterfs-specs
>>> (http://review.gluster.org/#/q/project:glusterfs-specs) project under
>>> review.gluster.org
>>>
>>> --Humble
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Currently on the gluster.org website, we're directing the 'Suggest a
>>>> feature' to the old mediawiki site for 'Features'.
>>>> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features
>>>>
>>>> In an ideal world, this would go somewhere else. Where should this go?
>>>> Let me know and I'll fix it.
>>>> - amye
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Amye Scavarda | amye@xxxxxxxxxx | Gluster Community Lead
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>
>>>
>> Said another way, if you wanted to be able to have someone contribute a
>> feature idea, what would be the best way?
>> Bugzilla? A google form? An email into the -devel list?
>>
>
> If it is more of a request from a user it should a bugzilla RFE. If the user
> requested on -devel list without a bug, then one of the community devs
> should file a bug for it.
> If it is a proposal for a feature with design details/implementation ideas
> then a patch to glusterfs-specs is encouraged.
get the attention of all concerned.
-Vijay
So should this stay on the website in the first place?
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
