On 05/18/2013 08:05 PM, John Smith wrote:
Hi,
Ah, thanks, I was looking in the wrong place. I was worried that he
results was invalid there for a moment.
Perhaps the directory '/usr/local/glusterfs/*' should be filtered out
of the report entirely ?
Yes, filtering that out could help.
Thanks,
Vijay
Thanks again,
Regards,
John Smith.
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05/17/2013 02:01 AM, John Smith wrote:
Hi,
Im not quite sure what im seeing here, but ...
the prove test './tests/basic/posixonly.t' should test, well, posix ;).
and yet the gcov report says its not being hit:
http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/lcov/glusterfs/usr/local/glusterfs/lib/glusterfs/3git/xlator/storage/posix.c.gcov.html
Does anyone who has a deeper understanding of both the codebase and
the test know if that test should indeed hit that file ? If so, the
report is wrong. And if not, the test may need to be changed.
The test should indeed hit posix.c. Wouldn't this be indicative of what
lines were covered by this test:
http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/lcov/glusterfs/xlators/storage/posix/src/posix.c.gcov.html
Thanks,
Vijay
