Hi, Ah, thanks, I was looking in the wrong place. I was worried that he results was invalid there for a moment. Perhaps the directory '/usr/local/glusterfs/*' should be filtered out of the report entirely ? Thanks again, Regards, John Smith. On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/17/2013 02:01 AM, John Smith wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> Im not quite sure what im seeing here, but ... >> >> the prove test './tests/basic/posixonly.t' should test, well, posix ;). >> >> and yet the gcov report says its not being hit: >> >> http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/lcov/glusterfs/usr/local/glusterfs/lib/glusterfs/3git/xlator/storage/posix.c.gcov.html >> >> Does anyone who has a deeper understanding of both the codebase and >> the test know if that test should indeed hit that file ? If so, the >> report is wrong. And if not, the test may need to be changed. >> > > The test should indeed hit posix.c. Wouldn't this be indicative of what > lines were covered by this test: > > http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/lcov/glusterfs/xlators/storage/posix/src/posix.c.gcov.html > > Thanks, > Vijay >
