Re: 1st results: gcov/lcov code coverage of glusterfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/14/2013 12:44 AM, John Smith wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05/11/2013 11:13 PM, Justin Clift wrote:

On 11/05/2013, at 6:13 PM, John Smith wrote:

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Justin Clift <jclift@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Heh, I personally have no idea with gcov/lcov stuff, so other people
that
do have a clue with it would be the ones to respond. :)

My sincerest apologies if I misunderstand here, but... ( i cant tell
if your kidding or not about not having a clue).


Wasn't kidding, so this was actually helpful. :)

Vijay, this lcov/gcov stuff is useful for the testing guys isn't it?


Useful for all of us who are interested in improving code coverage for
testing. As John indicates in his earlier post, this data provides useful
insight into files/functions that need more test coverage.

Thanks,
Vijay



Hi,


Thanks. If there is enough interest, I can write a wiki page on how to
set this up for yourself ? If yes, where should I create such a page ?
Over here, for example ? :
https://forge.gluster.org/glusterfs-core/pages/Code_Coverage/


Yes, that would be a good place to create such a page.

Thanks,
Vijay






[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux