On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/11/2013 11:13 PM, Justin Clift wrote: >> >> On 11/05/2013, at 6:13 PM, John Smith wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Justin Clift <jclift@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Heh, I personally have no idea with gcov/lcov stuff, so other people >>>> that >>>> do have a clue with it would be the ones to respond. :) >>>> >>> My sincerest apologies if I misunderstand here, but... ( i cant tell >>> if your kidding or not about not having a clue). >> >> >> Wasn't kidding, so this was actually helpful. :) >> >> Vijay, this lcov/gcov stuff is useful for the testing guys isn't it? >> > > Useful for all of us who are interested in improving code coverage for > testing. As John indicates in his earlier post, this data provides useful > insight into files/functions that need more test coverage. > > Thanks, > Vijay > Hi, Thanks. If there is enough interest, I can write a wiki page on how to set this up for yourself ? If yes, where should I create such a page ? Over here, for example ? : https://forge.gluster.org/glusterfs-core/pages/Code_Coverage/ Regards, John Smith.
