Re: 1st results: gcov/lcov code coverage of glusterfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 11:13 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
>>
>> On 11/05/2013, at 6:13 PM, John Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Justin Clift <jclift@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Heh, I personally have no idea with gcov/lcov stuff, so other people
>>>> that
>>>> do have a clue with it would be the ones to respond. :)
>>>>
>>> My sincerest apologies if I misunderstand here, but... ( i cant tell
>>> if your kidding or not about not having a clue).
>>
>>
>> Wasn't kidding, so this was actually helpful. :)
>>
>> Vijay, this lcov/gcov stuff is useful for the testing guys isn't it?
>>
>
> Useful for all of us who are interested in improving code coverage for
> testing. As John indicates in his earlier post, this data provides useful
> insight into files/functions that need more test coverage.
>
> Thanks,
> Vijay
>


Hi,


Thanks. If there is enough interest, I can write a wiki page on how to
set this up for yourself ? If yes, where should I create such a page ?
Over here, for example ? :
https://forge.gluster.org/glusterfs-core/pages/Code_Coverage/


Regards,


John Smith.



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux