Re: 1st results: gcov/lcov code coverage of glusterfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


Im not quite sure what im seeing here, but ...

the prove test './tests/basic/posixonly.t' should test, well, posix ;).

and yet the gcov report says its not being hit:
http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/lcov/glusterfs/usr/local/glusterfs/lib/glusterfs/3git/xlator/storage/posix.c.gcov.html

Does anyone who has a deeper understanding of both the codebase and
the test know if that test should indeed hit that file ? If so, the
report is wrong. And if not, the test may need to be changed.



Regards,


John Smith



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux