On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:55:00PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:52:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I believe not. I think that Junio prefers some callback that can handle a > > whole bunch of options (as opposed to the callback we can have now, to > > handle arguments for a specific option). > > Sorry, no. I do not want callbacks. I've been saying that parser > cascading is easier if you use an incremental interface like diff option > parser does. Now I'm confused: my understanding is that the diff option parser just leaves unrecognized stuff in argv. But isn't that what a PARSE_OPTIONS_IGNORE_UNKNOWN flag would do, and isn't that wrong? -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
