Re: [PATCH 1/2] parse_options: Add flag to prevent errors for further processing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > I think the only right way to accomplish this is to convert the revision
>> > and diff parameters into a parseopt-understandable format.
>> 
>> Not necessarily.  You could structure individual option parsers like how 
>> diff option parsers are done.  You iterate over argv[], feed diff option 
>> parser the current index into argv[] and ask if it is an option diff 
>> understands, have diff eat the option (and possibly its parameter) to 
>> advance the index, or allow diff option to say "I do not understand 
>> this", and then handle it yourself or hand it to other parsers.
>
> AFAIR Pierre tried a few ways, and settled with a macro to introduce the 
> diff options into a caller's options.
>
> IOW it would look something like this:
>
> static struct option builtin_what_options[] = {
> 	[... options specific to this command ...]
> 	DIFF__OPT(&diff_options)
> };

I think that is the more painful approach Jeff mentioned, and my comment
was to show that it is not the only way.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux