Re: [PATCH 1/2] parse_options: Add flag to prevent errors for further processing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > I think the only right way to accomplish this is to convert the revision
> > and diff parameters into a parseopt-understandable format.
> 
> Not necessarily.  You could structure individual option parsers like how 
> diff option parsers are done.  You iterate over argv[], feed diff option 
> parser the current index into argv[] and ask if it is an option diff 
> understands, have diff eat the option (and possibly its parameter) to 
> advance the index, or allow diff option to say "I do not understand 
> this", and then handle it yourself or hand it to other parsers.

AFAIR Pierre tried a few ways, and settled with a macro to introduce the 
diff options into a caller's options.

IOW it would look something like this:

static struct option builtin_what_options[] = {
	[... options specific to this command ...]
	DIFF__OPT(&diff_options)
};

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux