Re: [PATCH 1/2] parse_options: Add flag to prevent errors for further processing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 08:21:50PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > This adds the PARSE_OPT_NO_ERROR_ON_UNKNOWN flag which prevents
> > parse_options() from erroring out when it finds an unknown option,
> > and leaves the original command and unknown options in argv.
> 
> I have to say that this conceptually is broken.  How would you tell
> without knowing what "--flag" is if the thing in argv[] after that is a
> parameter to that option or the end of the options?

Agreed. I was just about to write the same thing. As it happens, I think
in the case of git-shortlog that there is not likely to be such a
parameter. The only three I see looking over setup_revisions are "-n"
(which is masked by shortlog anyway), "--default", and "-U" (which one
would never need with shortlog).

However I am still opposed to the concept, since its presence as a
parseopt flag implies that it isn't fundamentally broken.

I think the only right way to accomplish this is to convert the revision
and diff parameters into a parseopt-understandable format.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux