Re: [PATCH 1/2] parse_options: Add flag to prevent errors for further processing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:52:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I believe not.  I think that Junio prefers some callback that can handle a 
> whole bunch of options (as opposed to the callback we can have now, to 
> handle arguments for a specific option).

Sorry, no.  I do not want callbacks.  I've been saying that parser
cascading is easier if you use an incremental interface like diff option
parser does.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux