Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add a lot of dummy returns to avoid warnings with NO_NORETURN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Please remember to think for yourself. ;-)  Junio generally gives good
>> advice, but if you don't see the wisdom in it, that's the time to ask
>> questions, not blindly do a wrong thing.
>
> To be honest it's still not clear to me what was wrong with patch (2).

For example.

    diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c
    index 5286432..51ee2e5 100644
    --- a/builtin/commit.c
    +++ b/builtin/commit.c
    @@ -962,6 +962,7 @@ static const char *find_author_by_nickname(const char *name)
                    return strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL);
            }
            die(_("No existing author found with '%s'"), name);
    +	return NULL;
     }

When the above is applied and compiled without NO_NORETURN, the extra
return may be optimized out by the compiler as your commit log messages
said, but wouldn't it introduce a new warning:

  builtin/commit.c: In function 'find_author_by_nickname':
  builtin/commit.c:965: error: will never be executed

under -Wunreachable-code?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]