Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add a lot of dummy returns to avoid warnings with NO_NORETURN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> I would need to clarify with s/introduce noise/introduce more noise/; the
>> existing codebase is not noise-free.
>> 
>> But I do not see much point in making things worse, only to squelch
>> "reaches end of non void function" warnings that will be given under the
>> NO_NORETURN workaround configuration.
>
> Can you please give specific guidance what I should do to make
> the patchkit acceptable?

I am inclined to apply only 1 and 3, which is what I already have on 'pu'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]