> I would need to clarify with s/introduce noise/introduce more noise/; the > existing codebase is not noise-free. > > But I do not see much point in making things worse, only to squelch > "reaches end of non void function" warnings that will be given under the > NO_NORETURN workaround configuration. Can you please give specific guidance what I should do to make the patchkit acceptable? Current options are: 1) use original minimal patchkit (which had two warnings or so) 1b) use original minimal patchkit with warnings fixed 2) use global patch proposal for NO_NORETURN (= lots of warnings) 2b) use patch proposal + additional patch to fix warnings (posted here) 3) something I missed. Which one do you prefer? If 3 I would prefer specific guidance. Thanks, -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html