Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add test case for dealing with a tracked file in an ignored directory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 03:13, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> I just try to
>> (hopefully mostly helpfully) to point out common things that
>> contradict the docs we have
>
> Thanks for doing so, by the way.  One of the best ways to make sure
> the docs are sane is to use them.
>
> When a guideline is unclear, probably I should have been updating the
> docs instead of dispensing advice.
>
> How about something like this?
>
> diff --git a/t/README b/t/README
> index 410499a..f347de7 100644
> --- a/t/README
> +++ b/t/README
> @@ -235,7 +235,9 @@ Do's, don'ts & things to keep in mind
>  -------------------------------------
>
>  Here are a few examples of things you probably should and shouldn't do
> -when writing tests.
> +when writing tests.  If you are editing an existing test script and have
> +the time for it, consider updating the script to follow these guidelines
> +in a separate patch before adding your new test.

That looks good.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]