Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add test case for dealing with a tracked file in an ignored directory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 00:00, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Matthieu Moy wrote:
>
>> Not sure what is the gain by doing so, and the vast majority of tests
>> already there use the style of Greg's patch ...
>
> Right.  The usual rule when contributing to an existing project is
> "imitate the surruounding code", but there is often a tension between
> global style guidelines and the local conventions.
>
> In this case I have to agree with Matthieu: the test script is
> easier to read if it follows a single, consistent style.  The cleanup
> can happen another day.

Sure, I don't feel in any way strongly about it. I just try to
(hopefully mostly helpfully) to point out common things that
contradict the docs we have, especially with the tests, since I'm
getting pretty familiar with them :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]