Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add test case for dealing with a tracked file in an ignored directory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthieu Moy wrote:

> Not sure what is the gain by doing so, and the vast majority of tests
> already there use the style of Greg's patch ...

Right.  The usual rule when contributing to an existing project is
"imitate the surruounding code", but there is often a tension between
global style guidelines and the local conventions.

In this case I have to agree with Matthieu: the test script is
easier to read if it follows a single, consistent style.  The cleanup
can happen another day.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]