On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:39 PM, peter sikking <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > so back to your argument: > > 1) there is no value in usability testing random ideas, as were > implemented here. There are thousands of random ideas, with an > infinite number of combinations. there is value in testing UI designs > (step 2–5) to debug their concepts. > > 2) throwing out a prototype and getting some user feedback _is_ by > definition the armpit of usability. proper testing is a whole > other ball-game. > I see your opinion and I find that everyone like talking about GUI things :) Actually I'm not so interested in the GUI, but only interested in improving the brush behavior like line smoothing and color blending feature that is currently released and maintained as a separate patch by the another member in our project, which is called GIMP-painter. And actually GUI patch is only an option. I think toolbar is a good option though. I need some good stuff that can be implemented quickly to improve my own brush testing operation, because current GUI has many problems and I can't find any prospective concept or prototype implemented in the master branch... So if you all don't want to accept the toolbar, let's ignore them and discuss about the brush features. -- sigetch. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
