On 6/23/07, Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:26 +0200, gg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > I think "nearest neighbour" is non technical, very obvious in it's meaning > > and readily understood. > > IMO it is very technical and the vast majority of users does not > understand its meaning. They also don't understand Linear or Cubic for > that matter, but it's difficult to come up with simpler terms. Well, we could consider naming it in a slightly longer way but one that may be more suggestive to the ordinary user --- 1-factor (nearest neighbour) 2-factor (linear) 3-factor (cubic) 5-factor (lanczos3) -- is this number correct? So it would be a fairly simple and common pattern to see -- more factors taken into consideration -> more quality, more time. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
