Hi, On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 10:44 +0200, gg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Note the conditional "should" and the uncertainty "probably". I'm not > being dogmatic or presumptuous. I'm doing _exactly_ what you suggest > proposing a re-examination and also proposing an alternative that I > consider better. That's perfectly valid and we may even reconsider it. But then it used to be called nearest-neighbour and at some point we spent a lot of thought and discussion on these labels and changed them to what we have now. Somehow I am not very inclined to have this discussion again. It seems like a waste of time to change things back and forth when we could spend that time to move forward instead. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
