On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:51:13PM +0000, "Adam D. Moss" <adam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> pcg@xxxxxxxx ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
> >While I sometimes find the erase tool conceptually difficult to use
> >(maybe because it's so unusual), the question is wether this is just a
> >weird added feature (as most people including me _seem_ to view it), or
> >something that hinders people.
>
> Oh yeah, I don't know if you simply made a typo, but 'erase'
> isn't a problem, while 'unerase' is. Not a 'your app will
No, I was referring to the "erase tool" (actually "Eraser") since I was
too lazy to check how the unerase option is called ("Anti-Erase" here).
Sorry for making you guess.
I fully agree with what you say, othwerwise (I think :).
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@xxxxxxxx |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
