Re: floating point (was: Re: [Gimp-developer] R&H on Film Gimp and GIMP)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04-Dec-2002, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:49:05AM +0100, Tino Schwarze wrote:
> > I'm just curious: What do you get by using 32-bit _float_? Why not use
> > 1.31-Bit Fixed Point? It should have a higher precision than 32-bit
> > float - at least, it's precision is steady.
> 
> The point is probably to be allowed to go below 0 or over 1 -- you might not
> always want to work in a clamped range, like fixed point does.
> 

Yes, that would be very nice.

-- 
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || unknown@xxxxxxxxx
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd 
all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to
repetitive electronic music." --Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989

Attachment: pgpbpnEXfC28A.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux